MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2898113870

Latent Surgical Interventions in Residual Neural Networks

2018· preprint· en· W2898113870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin Donnot, Isabelle Guyon, Zheng‐Ying Liu, Marc Schoenauer, Antoine Marot, Patrick Panciatici

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualPsychological interventionArtificial neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyAlgorithmPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and study a novel artificial neural network framework, which allows us to model surgical interventions on a physical system. Our approach was developed to predict power flows in power transmission grids, in which high voltage lines are disconnected and reconnected with one-another from time to time, either accidentally or willfully. However, we anticipate a broader applicability. For several exemplary cases, we illustrate by simulation that our methodology permits learning from empirical data to predict the effect of a subset of interventions (ele-mentary interventions) and then generalize to combinations of interventions never seen during training. We verify this property mathematically in the additive perturbation case. In terms of transfer learning, this is equivalent to training on data from a few source domains then, with a zero-shot learning, generalizing to new target domains (super-generalization). Our architecture bears resemblance with the successful ResNets, with the simple modification that interventions are encoded as an addition of units in the neural network. For applications to real historical data, from the French high voltage power transmission company RTE, we evaluate the viability of this technique to rapidly assess curative actions that human operators take in emergency situations. Integrated in an overall planning and control system, methods deriving from our approach could allow Transmission System Operators (TSO) to assess in real time many more alternative actions, reaching a better exploration-exploitation tradeoff, compared to presently deployed physical system simulator. 1 Background and motivations In this paper, we are interested in speeding up the computation of power flows in power transmission grids using artificial neural networks, to emulate slower physical simulators. Key to our approach is the possibility of simulating the effect of actions on the grid topology. Such neural networks may then be used as part of an overall computer-assisted decision process in which human operators (dispatchers) ensure that the power grid is operated in security at all times, namely that the currents flowing in all lines are below certain thresholds (line thermal limits). We describe our application setting for concreteness, but anticipate a broader applicability of the techniques developed in this paper in various domains of physics, chemistry, manufacturing, biomedicine and others, in which some actions can be combined with each other, but running extensive simulations for each possible combination of such actions is computationally untractable. Electric power generated in production nodes (such as power plants) is transmitted towards consumption nodes in a power grid. The power lines enable this transmission through substations interconnecting them. Each pattern of connections is referred to as a grid topology. This topology is * Benjamin Donnot corresponding authors: benjamin.donnot@inria.com 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2018), Montréal, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→