MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898125119 · doi:10.1002/lob.10266

Scientists Investigate Eutrophication Mystery and find Oligotrophication Instead

2018· article· en· W2898125119 on OpenAlexaffabout
Naíla Barbosa da Costa

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEutrophicationTrophic levelTrophic state indexEnvironmental scienceAlgal bloomBloomEcologyWater qualityLake ecosystemBiomanipulationOceanographyNutrientGeographyHydrology (agriculture)EcosystemPhytoplanktonGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Just like doctors measure body temperature to detect fever, limnologists use a lake's trophic status as a “thermometer” to assess its health. The richer in nutrients a lake is, the more likely it is to develop algal or cyanobacterial blooms and, consequently, the worse the water quality. Limnologists have known for a long time that agricultural runoff can lead to lake eutrophication. What is surprising is that we are now detecting blooms in otherwise pristine lakes, located far from human-impacted areas. A remarkable example of this is the 2014 cyanobacterial bloom reported in Dickson Lake (Ontario) – a bloom that remains so far unexplained. Motivated by this mysterious case, Aleksey Paltsev, a PhD candidate in the University of Western Ontario, became curious about how frequently eutrophication occurs in lakes located in relatively undisturbed regions of the Great Lakes Basin. At the 2018 ASLO Meeting in Victoria (BC), he reported on his investigation, in which he followed changes in the trophic status of 12,600 lakes along a 28-year time course. To classify lake trophic status, Paltsev determined chlorophyll a concentrations based on reflectance values of band 3 (corresponding to green light intensity) from Landsat satellite images. “There is something that makes lakes stable and something that forces them to shift from one trophic status to other,” Paltsev says, “we wanted to know what makes some lakes more resilient than others.” For that, he classified lakes into those that were stable (i.e. permanently oligotrophic or eutrophic) and those that were changing from one stable state to another, either because they were becoming more oligotrophic or more eutrophic. His analysis found that more than 5000 lakes could be classified as stable oligotrophic and about 100 as stable eutrophic. A few lakes were unstable, not showing consistent trends toward eutrophication or oligotrophication. Among lakes experiencing a clear shift in stability, surprisingly, he found that more were undergoing oligotrophication (about 3000) than eutrophication (about 2000). Intrigued by this result, Paltsev wanted to explain why such an unexpected phenomenon was happening in the Great Lakes Basin. He then noticed that the amplitude of variation in both oligotrophying and eutrophying lakes was very similar across the time series, hinting that the same broad-scale environmental factors could be driving these processes. Paltsev noted that increased mean temperatures alone could not explain the observed shifts in lakes stability; instead, a combination of environmental factors and lake physical properties were more important defining a lake's fate across the 28-year period studied. He examined the effect of landscape metrics (e.g. percentage of wetland in the catchment), lake morphometry (e.g., lake fetch, width of the littoral zone, and maximum depth) and weather conditions (e.g., precipitation rates) on lake trophic stability. He observed that lakes undergoing eutrophication were relatively deep, had small fetch, wide littoral zone, were surrounded by many wetlands, and were located in watersheds with a decreasing trend in precipitation rates. Lakes undergoing oligotrophication were also relatively deep, but had a medium-size fetch, narrow littoral zone, were surrounded by only a few wetlands and located in watersheds with an increasing trend in precipitation. He concluded that a lake's morphometry and the catchment area influence nutrients inflow and water residence time, consequently impacting nutrient availability to phytoplankton. Bloom-forming algae and cyanobacteria will have more time to uptake nutrients in eutrophying lakes, which are, in general, more connected to the catchment and exhibit low residence time. This study provides clues to solve the mystery of Dickson Lake, and it goes further by showing an unexpected trend of oligotrophication in pristine lakes. However, it is still too early to predict the consequences of the undergoing changes. “Oligotrophication is less dangerous [to water quality] than eutrophication, but we don't know the consequences of it yet. It is really hard to predict how these lakes will react, lakes also have their own system,” Paltsev explains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and Oceanography BulletinSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207