MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898149788 · doi:10.58843/ornneo.v29i1.364

NEST DESCRIPTION AND NESTING BEHAVIOR OF THE RUFOUS-CAPPED WARBLER (BASILEUTERUS RUFIFRONS)

2018· article· en· W2898149788 on OpenAlexafffund
Alana D. Demko, Daniel Joshua Mennill

Bibliographic record

VenueOrnitología Neotropical · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsNest (protein structural motif)WarblerEcologyBiologyPopulationZoologyIncubationDemographyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract · The breeding biology of most tropical resident bird species is little-documented, particularly for sexually monomorphic species in which sex-specific contributions to nest-building and nestling provisioning are challenging to quantify. We describe nest structure and adult behavior throughout the nesting cycle for a color-banded population of Rufous-capped Warblers (Basileuterus rufifrons), a widespread sexually monomorphic tropical resident songbird. Using focal observations of 11 nests, combined with video monitoring during the incubation and nestling periods, we provide new information on this species’ nesting behavior, particularly sex-specific parental contributions to nest building, incubation, and nestling care. All nests were dome-shaped structures with a side entrance constructed of grasses, twigs, and leaves, as is typical for Basileuterus warblers. Females were the primary nest-builders, although we also observed male-assisted nest-building at one nest, which is a rare behavior in wood-warblers. Females were the sole incubators, and the incubation period in this population was 13–14 days. Video recordings confirmed that males and females made equivalent contributions to nestling feeding and nest sanitation. Our study provides detailed observations of both male and female Rufous-capped Warblers during all stages of the nesting cycle, and thus improves our understanding of nesting behavior in this common yet little-studied species.Resumen · Descripción del nido y comportamiento de anidación del Chipe gorrirrufo (Basileuterus rufifrons) La biología reproductiva de la mayoría de las aves residentes tropicales es poco conocida, particularmente para especies monocromáticas en que las contribuciones de cada sexo a la construcción de nido y la alimentación de los pichones son difíciles de observar. Describimos la estructura del nido y el comportamiento de los adultos durante todo el ciclo de anidación para una población anillada del Chipe gorrirrufo (Basileuterus rufifrons), una especie común de Paseriforme residente tropical monocromática. Con base en observaciones de 11 nidos y monitoreo de video durante los períodos de incubación y presencia de pichones, proveemos nueva información sobre el comportamiento de anidación de esta especie, particularmente sobre las contribuciones de cada sexo a la construcción de nido, la incubación, y el cuidado de los pichones. Todos los nidos presentaron estructura en forma de domo con entrada lateral, construidos con hierbas, palitos, y hojas, típicos de las especies de Basileuterus. Los nidos fueron construidos principalmente por las hembras, aunque en un nido observamos que la construcción fue asistida por el macho, un comportamiento raro en la familia Parulidae. Solo las hembras incubaron los huevos, y el período de incubación en esta población fue de 13–14 días. Los videos confirmaron que los machos y las hembras contribuyeron igualmente a la alimentación de los pichones y la limpieza del nido. Nuestro estudio provee observaciones detalladas de ambos sexos del Chipe gorrirrufo durante todo el ciclo de anidación, mejorando nuestro entendimiento sobre el comportamiento de anidación en esta especie común pero poco estudiada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrnitología NeotropicalSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207