Integrated, Regional‐Scale Hydrologic Modeling of Inland Lakes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inland lakes constitute an important global freshwater resource and are often defining features of local and regional landscapes. While coupled surface water (SW) and groundwater (GW) models are increasingly available, there is a clear need for spatially explicit yet computationally parsimonious modeling frameworks to explore the impacts of climate, land use, and other drivers on lake hydrologic and biogeochemical processes. To address this need, we developed a new method to simulate daily water budgets for many individual lakes at large spatial scales. By integrating SW, GW, and lake water budget models in a simple manner, we created a modeling framework capable of simulating the historical and future hydrologic dynamics of lakes with varying hydrologic characteristics. By extension, the model output enables ecological modeling in response to hydrologic drivers. As a case study, we applied the model to a large, lake‐rich region in northern Wisconsin and Michigan, simulating daily water budgets for nearly 4,000 lakes over a 36‐year period. Despite minimal calibration efforts, our simulated results compared reasonably well with observations and more sophisticated modeling approaches. Our integrated modeling requires very limited information, can be run on readily available computer resources, such as a desktop PC, and can be applied at regional, continental, or global scales, where necessary model setup and forcing data are available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".