MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898201119 · doi:10.1002/mrm.27527

A framework for Fourier‐decomposition free‐breathing pulmonary <sup>1</sup>H MRI ventilation measurements

2018· article· en· W2898201119 on OpenAlexafffund
Fumin Guo, Dante P. I. Capaldi, David G. McCormack, Aaron Fenster, Grace Párraga

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsReproducibilitySegmentationImage registrationCorrelation coefficientCoefficient of variationNuclear medicineSimilarity (geometry)Fiducial markerArtificial intelligenceVentilation (architecture)Pearson product-moment correlation coefficientConcordance correlation coefficientMathematicsComputer scienceBiomedical engineeringPattern recognition (psychology)MedicinePhysicsStatisticsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose To develop a rapid Fourier decomposition (FD) free‐breathing pulmonary 1 H MRI (FDMRI) image processing and biomarker pipeline for research use. Methods We acquired MRI in 20 asthmatic subjects using a balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) sequence optimized for ventilation imaging. 2D 1 H MRI series were segmented by enforcing the spatial similarity between adjacent images and the right‐to‐left lung volume–ratio. The segmented lung series were co‐registered using a coarse‐to‐fine deformable registration framework that used dual optimization techniques. All pairwise registrations were implemented in parallel and FD was performed to generate 2D ventilation‐weighted maps and ventilation‐defect‐percent (VDP). Lung segmentation and registration accuracy were evaluated by comparing algorithm and manual lung‐masks, deformed manual lung‐masks, and fiducials in the moving and fixed images using Dice‐similarity‐coefficient (DSC), mean‐absolute‐distance (MAD), and target‐registration‐error (TRE). The relationship of FD‐VDP and 3 He‐VDP was evaluated using the Pearson‐correlation‐coefficient ( r ) and Bland Altman analysis. Algorithm reproducibility was evaluated using the coefficient‐of‐variation (CoV) and intra‐class‐correlation‐coefficient (ICC) for segmentation, registration, and FD‐VDP components. Results For lung segmentation, there was a DSC of 95 ± 1.5% and MAD of 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, and for registration there was a DSC of 97 ± 0.8%, MAD of 1.6 ± 0.4 mm and TRE of 3.6 ± 1.2 mm. Reproducibility for segmentation DSC (CoV/ICC = 0.5%/0.92), registration TRE (CoV/ICC = 0.4%/0.98), and FD‐VDP (Cov/ICC = 3.9%/0.97) was high. The pipeline required 10 min/subject. FD‐VDP was correlated with 3 He‐VDP ( r = 0.69, P &lt; 0.001) although there was a bias toward lower FD‐VDP (bias = −4.9%). Conclusions We developed and evaluated a pipeline that provides a rapid and precise method for FDMRI ventilation maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207