Mixture separability loss in a deep convolutional network for image classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In machine learning, the cost function is crucial because it measures how good or bad a system is. In image classification, well‐known networks only consider modifying the network structures and applying cross‐entropy loss at the end of the network. However, using only cross‐entropy loss causes a network to stop updating weights when all training images are correctly classified. This is the problem of early saturation. This study proposes a novel cost function, called mixture separability loss (MSL), which updates the weights of the network even when most of the training images are accurately predicted. MSL consists of between‐class and within‐class loss. Between‐class loss maximises the differences between inter‐class images, whereas within‐class loss minimises the similarities between intra‐class images. They designed the proposed loss function to attach to different convolutional layers in the network in order to utilise intermediate feature maps. Experiments show that a network with MSL deepens the learning process and obtains promising results with some public datasets, such as Street View House Number, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, and the authors’ self‐collected Inha Computer Vision Lab gender dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".