MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898300718

La pedagogía critica en tiempos oscuros / Critical Pedagogy in dark times

2014· article· es· W2898300718 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational theories and practices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyCritical theoryCritical pedagogyPhilosophyPedagogyEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los beneficios sociales y derechos otorgados por el estado de bienestar están siendo desmantelados por las fuerzas del neoliberalismo. Por ese motivo los educadores necesitamos desarrollar formas de pedagogía crítica capaces de desafiarlo. Una pedagogía crítica como proyecto de democracia insurrecta que pueda analizar las relaciones entre conocimiento, autoridad y poder, comprometida en la responsabilidad de los docentes como intelectuales públicos, a favor de una esperanza educada que ofrece el conocimiento crítico ligado a un cambio social democrático.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.657
Teacher spread0.442 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it