MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898361648 · doi:10.1049/joe.2018.8768

Independent‐phase current control of a three‐phase VSC under unbalanced operating conditions

2018· article· en· W2898361648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)IntegratorPhase-locked loopModular designThree-phaseCurrent (fluid)Voltage sourcePhase (matter)VoltagePower (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringControl (management)PhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents an independent phase‐current‐control architecture for a three‐phase voltage source converter. It comprises three independent single‐phase phase locked loops (PLLs), and a dual‐loop scheme including an outer loop (responsible for active power and ac voltage control) and three similar inner current control loops. To obtain reliable phase‐tracking, an enhanced second‐order generalised integrator‐based PLL is developed. The phase‐tracking angle is strategically selected from the three PLLs to minimise the impact of imbalance‐induced distortions. To validate the proposed control scheme, extensive simulations are conducted for a 101‐level, 500‐MW, 500‐kV (dc) half‐bridge modular multi‐level converter in PSCAD/EMTDC. The simulation results prove that the proposed scheme enables the system to ride through unbalanced conditions effectively and reliably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it