MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898374057 · doi:10.4000/iss.847

Le statut de conservateur dans les musées nord-américains : perspectives géopolitiques

2018· article· fr· W2898374057 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueICOFOM Study Series · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le conservateur de musée est longtemps demeuré la figure emblématique du musée. Le modèle européen du conservateur s’est transformé dans le contexte nord-américain en raison du contexte géopolitique. Le mouvement international de la nouvelle muséologie combiné au développement du réseau muséal et à la professionnalisation des musées dans la seconde moitié du XXe siècle a contribué à remettre en question le statut du conservateur en favorisant l’apparition de nouveaux professionnels (conservateurs invités, chargés de projet d’exposition, commissaires, archivistes et directeurs). Si la fonction de conservateur éclate et prend de nouvelles formes adaptées aux changements qui transforment les musées, le contexte géopolitique et économique de l’Amérique du Nord favorise la reconnaissance d’un modèle de « muséologue » qui renoue en quelque sorte avec la figure traditionnelle du conservateur généraliste et polyvalent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it