MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898393785 · doi:10.1002/jbio.201800271

Quantitative subsurface spatial frequency‐domain fluorescence imaging for enhanced glioma resection

2018· editorial· en· W2898393785 on OpenAlexaff
Mira Sibai, Dennis J. Wirth, Frédéric Leblond, David W. Roberts, Keith D. Paulsen, Brian C. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biophotonics · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsProtoporphyrin IXFluorescenceGliomaPhotodynamic therapyExcitationChemistryDiffuse reflectionOpticsNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials sciencePhysicsMedicineCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rate of complete resection of glioma has improved with the introduction of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence image guidance. Surgical outcomes are further enhanced when the fluorescence signal is decoupled from the intrinsic tissue optical absorption and scattering obtained from diffuse reflectance measurements, yielding the absolute PpIX concentration, [PpIX]. Spatial frequency domain imaging was used previously to measure [PpIX] in near-surface tumors under blue fluorescence excitation. Here, we extend this to subsurface [PpIX] fluorescence under red-light excitation. The decay rate of the modulation amplitude of the fluorescence signal was used to calculate the PpIX depth, which was then applied in a forward diffusion model to estimate [PpIX] at depth. For brain-like optical properties in phantoms with PpIX fluorescent inclusions, the depth can be recovered up to depths of 9.5 mm ± 0.4 mm, with [PpIX] ranging from 5 to 15 μg/mL within an average deviation of 15% from the true [PpIX] value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiophotonicsSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207