MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898405148 · doi:10.1016/s1441-2772(23)00689-0

A cluster randomised, crossover, registry-embedded clinical trial of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor blockers for ulcer prophylaxis therapy in the intensive care unit (PEPTIC study): study protocol

2018· article· en· W2898405148 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul J. Young, Sean M. Bagshaw, Andrew Forbes, Alistair Nichol, Stephen E. Wright, Rinaldo Bellomo, Michael Bailey, Richard Beasley, Glenn M. Eastwood, Marino Festa, David Gattas, Frank van Haren, Edward Litton, Paul Mouncey, Leanlove Navarra, David Pilcher, Diane Mackle, Colin McArthur, Shay McGuinness, Manoj Saxena, Steve Webb, Kathy Rowan

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care and Resuscitation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStress ulcerIntensive care unitIntensive carePepticProton-pump inhibitorRandomized controlled trialUpper gastrointestinal bleedingIntensive care medicineClinical trialClinical endpointEmergency medicineInternal medicinePeptic ulcerEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The balance of risks and benefits with using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) versus histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RB) for stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients who are invasively ventilated in the intensive care unit (ICU) is uncertain. Objective: To describe the study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers for Ulcer Prophylaxis Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit (PEPTIC) study. Design, setting and participants: Protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, cluster crossover, registry-embedded trial to be conducted in 50 ICUs in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. The PEPTIC study will compare two approaches to stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated adults implemented at the level of the ICU. One approach is to use PPIs as the default therapy and the other approach is to use H2RBs as the default therapy when stress ulcer prophylaxis is prescribed. Each ICU, by random allocation, will use one approach for 6 months and will then switch to the opposite approach for the next 6 months. The PEPTIC study began recruitment in August 2016 and will complete recruitment in January 2019. Main outcome measures: The primary end point will be in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Clostridium difficile infection, ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay. Results and conclusions: The PEPTIC study will compare the effect on in-hospital mortality of implementing, at the level of the ICU, the use of PPI as the preferred agent for stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated adults in the ICU with using H2RB as the preferred agent. Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTRN 12616000481471).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care and ResuscitationSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207