MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898428916 · doi:10.1137/17m114741x

Manifold Sampling for Optimization of Nonconvex Functions That Are Piecewise Linear Compositions of Smooth Components

2018· article· en· W2898428916 on OpenAlexaff
Kamil A. Khan, Jeffrey Larson, Stefan M. Wild

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Optimization · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOffice of ScienceAdvanced Scientific Computing ResearchU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMathematicsManifold (fluid mechanics)PiecewiseIterated functionSubgradient methodPiecewise linear functionSampling (signal processing)Sequence (biology)Differentiable functionFunction (biology)Stationary pointCombinatoricsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a manifold sampling algorithm for the minimization of a nonsmooth composite function $f \triangleq \psi + h \circ F$ when $\psi$ is smooth with known derivatives, $h$ is a known, nonsmooth, piecewise linear function, and $F$ is smooth but expensive to evaluate. The trust-region algorithm classifies points in the domain of $h$ as belonging to different manifolds and uses this knowledge when computing search directions. Since $h$ is known, classifying objective manifolds using only the values of $F$ is simple. We prove that all cluster points of the sequence of the manifold sampling algorithm iterates are Clarke stationary; this holds although points evaluated by the algorithm are not assumed to be differentiable and when only approximate derivatives of $F$ are available. Numerical results show that manifold sampling using zeroth-order information about $F$ is competitive with algorithms that employ exact subgradient values from $\partial f$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on OptimizationSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207