MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898438887 · doi:10.1520/gtj20170091

Strategies for One Dimensional (1D) Compression Testing of Large-Particle-Sized Tire Derived Aggregate

2018· article· en· W2898438887 on OpenAlexaff
Doyin Adesokan, Ian Fleming, Adam Hammerlindl, John McDougall

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCompression (physics)CreepParticle (ecology)Aggregate (composite)ScrapParticle sizeLoad cellGeotechnical engineeringStructural engineeringCompressive strengthComposite materialEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Laboratory testing of a mass of large-particle-sized tire derived aggregate (TDA) to assess performance-related properties such as void ratio, compressive creep, and hydraulic conductivity under large loads poses a number of experimental challenges. Large-particle-sized TDA is shredded scrap tires with particle sizes from 50 mm to over 305 mm. The large particle size of the TDA mass results in experimental challenges, such as the need for a large test chamber and the need for a load application system with a capacity to apply and sustain large loads, while accommodating large vertical displacements from the compression of the TDA mass. As an example, to put these requirements into perspective, a mass of TDA with a nominal particle size of 150 mm requires a test cell diameter of at least 600 mm and preferably a diameter of 700 mm. If a load of 400 kPa were to be applied onto the TDA mass to simulate approximately 35 m to 40 m of overlying material (waste and routinely applied cover materials) in an application such as a landfill, the test apparatus must be capable of delivering over 150 kN of applied load. Furthermore, for a reasonable initial mass of TDA that is 1.2 m thick, the test cell will have to be designed to maintain that load over 0.6 m of vertical displacement because of the compression of the TDA mass. This article presents a number of practical strategies that were implemented to overcome the experimental challenges with testing large particle size, highly compressible TDA mass to establish the performance related properties for use in service. In some instances, components of the test equipment had to be re-engineered to accommodate exigencies that had not been anticipated, such as differential compression of the TDA mass. The focus of this article is on equipment design and experimental methodologies. A few sample results from the study are presented to illustrate the successful implementation of the design methodologies. Although TDA has been studied in this work, the strategies described herein can be applied to a wide range of highly compressible materials under large loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeotechnical Testing JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationFrench-language works237,207