MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898454206 · doi:10.1080/17411912.2018.1532305

‘Traveling-in-dwelling, dwelling-in-traveling’: producing multicultural Canada through narrations of mobility on CBC Radio’s <i>Fuse</i>

2018· article· en· W2898454206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnomusicology Forum · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsFuse (electrical)NarrativeBroadcasting (networking)MulticulturalismSociologyFace (sociological concept)CorporationStyle (visual arts)Representation (politics)Media studiesGender studiesPolitical scienceVisual artsArtEngineeringComputer scienceLiteratureSocial scienceElectrical engineeringLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case study of Fuse, a live concert-style radio programme produced between 2005 and 2008 by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), explores the distinctive ways that travel and mobility were narrated on air. I suggest that there are meaningful correlations between the discursive tropes that I label ‘transit’ and ‘road’ narratives, and the patterns of representation found on Fuse. These correlations contribute to maintaining hierarchical discourses about Canadian social relations in the face of policies and discourses relating to multiculturalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it