Clickstream Analytics: An Experimental Analysis of the Amazon Users' Simulated Monthly Traffic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Online shopping in recent years demonstrate a constant increase and as a result the study of user behavior through clickstream has attracted again the interest of the research community. This increase though requires novel approaches to clickstream analytics since the volume of the products available online and the corresponding transactions is huge. In this paper, a sequential frequent itemsets detection methodology (SAFID) is adopted to solve a clickstream analytics problem by analyzing a composite dataset which simulates monthly traffic of Amazon U.S. online retail shop. It is shown that the methodology can perform the analysis very efficiently in a simple desktop and detect all the frequently bought together products which can provide valuable knowledge to marketers of online retail stores. The methodology used can further be improved to handle larger datasets by considering a cloud computing environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it