MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898477566 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2877762

Energy-Efficient Sleep Scheduling in WBANs: From the Perspective of Minimum Dominating Set

2018· article· en· W2898477566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersBeijing Institute of TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless sensor networkApproximation algorithmScheduling (production processes)Energy consumptionEfficient energy useSleep modeMathematical optimizationAlgorithmComputer networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless body area networks (WBANs) that offer various medical applications have received considerable attention in recent years. Due to limited energy of sensors, duty-cycling technique is employed to prolong the network lifetime. However, it results in long delivery delay and suffers from reliability issues. In this paper, we introduce an efficient and reliable sleep scheduling scheme from the perspective of constructing m-fold dominating set (DS), where m is the number of links from a node outside DS to those in DS. The key idea is to activate partial nodes at each frame to form a DS which can guarantee the network reliability such that the other nodes can fall asleep to save energy. Technically, we formulate the sleep scheduling in a WBAN as a problem of constructing minimum weighted m-fold DS, which is proven NP-hard. We first design an H(m + δ)-approximation algorithm, namely global approximation algorithm, by globally picking the optimal node based on a polymatroid function, where H(·) is the Harmonic number and δ is the maximum node degree. Then, we propose a simplified 1 +ln (mδ)-approximation algorithm, referred to as local approximation algorithm, to reduce computational complexity and execution rounds. We further conduct extensive simulations to confirm the superiority of our proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it