MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898495177 · doi:10.1109/ppic.2018.8502239

Basics of Communication Networks for Electrical Engineers in the Forest Products Industries

2018· article· en· W2898495177 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomationCommunications protocolComputer scienceProcess (computing)Process automation systemProtocol (science)Communications systemAutomatic meter readingEmbedded systemSystems engineeringSoftware engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer networkWirelessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The functionality of various communication methods continue to change as advanced protocols and media are applied to, not only commercial products, but also industrial products. This paper will provide the electrical engineer with a fundamental background and other basics regarding various communication standards, protocols and media. When electrical engineers are engaged in the interconnection of devices where various communication methods are employed, a review of the requirements of these systems is required. These may include process automation protocols, industrial control system protocols, building automation protocols, power system automation protocols, and automatic meter reading protocols. These system requirements demand a full review to determine the interconnections and media necessary for successfully integrating these into the enterprise communication system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207