PO588 Omentum Transplantation In Lactents and Elders on the Treatment of Post Operatory Mediastinitis Due to Sternotomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of planned mode and planned timing of delivery on neonatal outcomes in infants with gastroschisis.Data from the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network cohort were used to identify 519 fetuses with isolated gastroschisis who were delivered at all tertiary-level perinatal centers in Canada from 2005-2013 (n = 16). Neonatal outcomes (including length of stay, duration of total parenteral nutrition, and a composite of perinatal death or prolonged exclusive total parenteral nutrition) were compared according to the 32-week gestation planned mode and timing of delivery with the use of the multivariable quantile and logistic regression.Planned induction of labor was not associated with decreased length of stay (adjusted median difference, –2.6 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], –9.9 to 4.8), total parenteral nutrition duration (adjusted median difference, −0.2 days; 95% CI, –6.4 to 6.0), or risk of the composite adverse outcome (relative risk, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.1–3.2) compared with planned vaginal delivery after spontaneous onset of labor. Planned delivery at 36-37 weeks’ gestation was not associated with decreased length of stay (adjusted median difference, 5.9 days; 95% CI, –5.7 to 17.5), total parenteral nutrition duration (adjusted median difference, 3.2 days; 95% CI, –7.9 to 14.3), or risk of composite outcome (relative risk, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.8–5.4) compared with planned delivery at ≥38 weeks' gestation.Infants with gastroschisis who were delivered after planned induction or planned delivery at 36-37 weeks’ gestation did not have significantly better neonatal outcomes than planned vaginal delivery after spontaneous onset of labor and planned delivery at ≥38 weeks' gestation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".