MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898496147 · doi:10.1145/3265863.3265877

QoS based Joint Radio Resource Allocation for Multi-Homing Calls in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Network

2018· article· en· W2898496147 on OpenAlexaff
Nagina Zarin, Anjali Agarwal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceSubcarrierResource allocationComputer networkMultihomingWireless networkMathematical optimizationLagrange multiplierWirelessThroughputDistributed computingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose QoS based radio resource allocation, where multi modal users are capable to connect to multi-RATs in heterogeneous wireless access network (HWAN). Our optimization problem is based on system sum-rate maximization under the QoS constraint. We propose a joint radio resource allocation scheme where we use Lagrange duality and dual update method to find a solution for the optimal allocation of subcarrier and power in OFDMA system and optimal time share in WLAN system. Numerical results show that the overall sum-throughput of our proposed optimal resource allocation algorithm in HWAN for multi-RAT approach outperforms the single RAT approach that uses WLAN or OFDMA based system. Furthermore, we analyze the impact of minimum data rate requirement of mobile users on the convergence rate of our proposed algorithm. Matlab based simulation results show that convergence rate of our propose algorithm is independent of the minimum data rate requirement of users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207