MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898588440 · doi:10.1177/1477760618798267

The effect of polyester recycled tire fibers mixed with ground tire rubber on polyethylene composites. Part I

2018· article· en· W2898588440 on OpenAlexafffund
Siavosh Moghaddamzadeh, Denis Rodrigue

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Rubber Plastics and Recycling Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialNatural rubberExtrusionLinear low-density polyethylenePolyethyleneMaleic anhydrideHigh-density polyethyleneMolding (decorative)CompoundingPlastics extrusionPolymerCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of polyester recycled tire fibers (RTFs) mixed with ground tire rubber (GTR) in linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) with and without styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene-grafted maleic anhydride was studied. In particular, different RTF contents (10, 25, and 50 wt%) and compounding screw speed (110, 180, and 250 r min −1 ), as well as temperature profiles (extrusion and injection molding) were used to optimize the processing conditions. In this first part, a complete physical and morphological analysis for the RTF fibers and GTR particles was performed. The results show that the compatibilized compounds have lower RTF length and GTR particle size but better distribution of rubber particles in the LLDPE matrix. Overall, lower processing temperatures used in both extrusion and injection molding showed better interfacial adhesion between the components due to higher shear and mechanical energy imparted on the different particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Rubber Plastics and Recycling TechnologySame topicNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesFrench-language works237,207