MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898619749 · doi:10.1128/aac.02068-18

<i>In Vitro</i> Activity of Plazomicin against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Patients in Canadian Hospitals from 2013 to 2017 as Part of the CANWARD Surveillance Study

2018· article· en· W2898619749 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Walkty, James A. Karlowsky, Melanie Baxter, Heather J. Adam, George G. Zhanel

Bibliographic record

VenueAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobiologyMorganella morganiiBroth microdilutionProteus mirabilisProteusGramProvidenciaAminoglycosideAntimicrobialStaphylococcus aureusMedicineEnterobacteriaceaeBiologyAntibioticsEscherichia coliMinimum inhibitory concentrationBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method was used to evaluate the in vitro activities of plazomicin and comparator antimicrobial agents against 7,712 Gram-negative and 4,481 Gram-positive bacterial pathogens obtained from 2013 to 2017 from patients in Canadian hospitals as part of the CANWARD Surveillance Study. Plazomicin demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae (MIC 90 ≤ 1 µg/ml for all species tested except Proteus mirabilis and Morganella morganii ), including aminoglycoside-nonsusceptible, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapySame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207