MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898635508 · doi:10.1063/1.5065129

Effect of viscosity on the supersonic outflow of focused jets in the semi-closed channels

2018· article· en· W2898635508 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. M. Abashev, I. V. Eremkin, N. P. Zhivotov, V. P. Zamuraev, А. П. Калинина, P. K. Tretyakov, A. V. Tupikin

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleMechanicsSupersonic speedOutflowViscosityPhysicsJet (fluid)Flow (mathematics)Euler equationsChannel (broadcasting)Point (geometry)Euler's formulaClassical mechanicsGeometryMathematicsComputer scienceThermodynamicsMeteorologyMathematical analysisTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The slotted nozzles can be an alternative to Laval nozzles. The jets inflowing through the holes can be directed towards each other (opposing jets) or be focused at a single point on the axis (focused jets). It has been shown numerically and experimentally that it is necessary to consider the effect of viscosity for the numerical modeling of focused jets in order to predict the flow parameters on the channel surface. Nevertheless, the calculation accuracy based on the unsteady Euler equation is quite sufficient for averaged values in the output cross section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207