Identification of Time-Varying Cortico-cortical and Cortico-Muscular Coherence during Motor Tasks with Multivariate Autoregressive Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neural populations coordinate at fast subsecond time-scales during rest and task execution. As a result, functional brain connectivity assessed with different neuroimaging modalities (EEG, MEG, fMRI) may also change over different time scales. In addition to the more commonly used sliding window techniques, the General Linear Kalman Filter (GLFK) approach has been proposed to estimate time-varying brain connectivity. In the present work, we propose a modification of the GLFK approach to model timevarying connectivity. We also propose a systematic method to select the hyper-parameters of the model. We evaluate the performance of the method using MEG and EMG data collected from 12 young subjects performing two motor tasks (unimanual and bimanual hand grips), by quantifying time-varying cortico-cortical and corticomuscular coherence (CCC and CMC). The CMC results revealed patterns in accordance with earlier findings, as well as an improvement in both time and frequency resolution compared to sliding window approaches. These results suggest that the proposed methodology is able to unveil accurate time-varying connectivity patterns with an excellent time resolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".