MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898677730 · doi:10.5539/mas.v12n11p406

CRUSH: A New Lossless Compression Algorithm

2018· article· en· W2898677730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmHuffman codingGolomb codingLossless compressionEntropy encodingData compressionLossy compressionArithmetic codingContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingImage compressionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimedia is highly competitive world, one of the properties that is reflected is speed of download and upload of multimedia elements: text, sound, pictures, animation. This paper presents CRUSH algorithm which is a lossless compression algorithm. CRUSH algorithm can be used to compress files. CRUSH method is fast and simple with time complexity O(n) where n is the number of elements being compressed.Furthermore, compressed file is independent from algorithm and unnecessary data structures. As the paper will show comparison with other compression algorithms like Shannon–Fano code, Huffman coding, Run Length Encoding, Arithmetic Coding, Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW), Run Length Encoding (RLE), Burrows-Wheeler Transform.Move-to-Front (MTF) Transform, Haar, wavelet tree, Delta Encoding, Rice &Golomb Coding, Tunstall coding, DEFLATE algorithm, Run-Length Golomb-Rice (RLGR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it