MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898690905 · doi:10.7202/1052651ar

Le genre du rêve

2018· article· fr· W2898690905 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amalia Dragani

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article a pour objet les représentations et les pratiques oniriques et divinatoires à la lumière du genre. La narration du rêve revêt un caractère de parole confidentielle chez les poètes touaregs qui, à la différence des auteures féminines, n’en font pas un thème poétique. Les pratiques oniriques, associées au monde des morts, des génies et à la sexualité, sont d’ordinaire perçues comme appartenant à la sphère féminine. Cependant, elles font discrètement l’objet de pratiques masculines, mais de nuit et en toute discrétion. Les tensions récemment introduites par les islamistes au Nord du Mali, lesquels condamnent les pratiques mantiques, musicales et poétiques, font que les hommes et les poètes se montrent de plus en plus discrets sur leur vie onirique et leur processus créateur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicAfrican Studies and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207