Combined Regression and Classification Models for Accurate Estimation of Walking Speed Using a Wrist-worn IMU
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Walking speed is an important quantity not only in fitness applications but also for Iifestyle and health monitoring purposes. With the recent advances in MEMS technology, miniature body-worn sensors have been used for ambulatory walking speed estimation using regression models. However, studies show that these models are more prone to errors in slow walking regime compared to normal and fast walking regimes. To address this issue, our study proposes a combined classification and regression walking speed estimation model. An experimental evaluation was performed on 10 healthy subjects during treadmill walking trials using a smartwatch. The experimental results show that including the classification model can improve the accuracy of walking speed estimation in the slow speed regime by about 22%. The results show that the proposed combined model has error of less than around 13% for various walking speed regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it