A9796 Effect of Long-term Lifestyle Intervention on Mild Cognitive Impairment in Hypertensive Occupational Population in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of lifestyle intervention on blood pressure and cognitive function in occupational population with hypertension in China. Methods: Cluster sampling was conducted in September, 2013, in Shaanxi Jinduicheng (intervention group) and Shaanxi Hancheng (control group). The intervention group received regular lifestyle intervention for 2 years, which included diet, smoke, drink and exercise intervention. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)was measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).We conducted BP measurement and MoCA questionnaire at baseline,6,12 and 24 months. Results: We analyzed a total of 510 subjects, whose average age was 45.6 ± 13.4 years old.With the increase of BP level, the MoCA scores decreased significantly both in control and lifestyle intervention groups (P < 0.05).There was no obvious differences between the hypertensive patients whose age was between 45 and 59 to those under 45 (P > 0.05).After 2 years, the BP,TC and glucose of the lifestyle intervention subgroup and lifestyle intervention plus medication subgroup decreased (P < 0.05), and the MoCA scores increased (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the BP and MoCA scores had no obvious changes at 6 months (P > 0.05), but the BP decreased and the MoCA scores increased significantly in the intervention group after 1 year and 2 years of lifestyle intervention (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Long-term lifestyle intervention can be used as adjunctive therapy to improve the blood pressure and cognitive function of hypertensive occupational population in China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".