MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898727019

Respiration Rate Estimation From Noisy Electrocardiograms Based on Modulation Spectral Analysis

2018· article· en· W2898727019 on OpenAlexaff
Raymundo Cassani, Shrikanth Narayanan, Tiago H. Falk

Bibliographic record

VenueCMBES Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceSpectral analysisRespirationPattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematicsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel method to estimate the respiration rate (RR) from a noisy electrocardiogram (ECG) signal. The method exploits the second order periodicity of the ECG signal, caused by the influence of respiration, and relies on the so-called modulation spectral signal representation to quantify RR from the noisy ECG. The methodology is validated on two datasets, one collected at rest using medical-grade sensors and another with users wearing an off-the-shelf smartshirt throughout their workday. The paper also explores the impact of ECG recording duration on RR estimation. Results show that ECG signal recordings of 120 seconds, or longer, lead to an adequate RR estimate with an error percentage ≤12.5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMBES ProceedingsSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207