Vínculos entre Japón y Canadá: un análisis centrado en la visita imperial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente estudio examina los vínculos entre Japón y Canadá, focalizado en la visita de los emperadores nipones a Canadá en julio de 2009, dada la trascendencia que supuso dicho acontecimiento. En torno a este hecho clave se revisan las estrategias diplomáticas, el significado comercial y las reacciones populares a la luz de algunos datos tales como el rol del emperador para la cultura japonesa actual. Considerando el enorme tamaño del país más su diversidad interna, se centra el estudio en los vínculos con la ciudad de Vancouver en particular, situada en la región oeste del mismo. A tal efecto se inspecciona la prensa escrita de la época y se realiza entrevistas a informantes clave con el objeto de relevar qué clase de vínculos se tendieron a través del Pacífico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".