MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898788345 · doi:10.1109/hpcs.2018.00053

EAWA: Energy-Aware Workload Assignment in Data Centers

2018· article· en· W2898788345 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Morteza Mirhoseini Nejad, Ghada Badawy, Douglas G. Down

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkloadData centerComputer scienceEnergy consumptionCloud computingPower (physics)Real-time computingSet (abstract data type)Distributed computingServerComputer networkOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the challenges that today's cloud computing infrastructures, and more specifically data centers, are struggling with is related to their energy consumption. Information technology (IT) equipment and cooling infrastructure are key parts of the total energy expenditure in a data center. A considerable amount of power is wasted due to workload management inefficiencies and the lack of coordination between cooling units and IT equipment. In this paper, server differences in terms of their cooling requirements and power consumption are taken into account for workload distribution. An optimal workload assignment problem that takes both server power consumption and thermal models into account is formulated. A simple low complexity algorithm is proposed. The algorithm not only assigns workload but it also adjusts the cooling unit set-point accordingly. Results show that the proposed algorithm can significantly reduce the total power consumed in a data center, in particular when compared to the uniform workload distribution algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207