MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898820646 · doi:10.1155/2018/3743710

Reoptimization Heuristic for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem

2018· article· en· W2898820646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaUniversidad del Bío-BíoUniversidad del Valle
KeywordsVehicle routing problemMathematical optimizationHeuristicRouting (electronic design automation)Computer scienceContext (archaeology)Time horizonMetaheuristicAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solution to a dynamic context of the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) is challenging. Routing and replenishment decisions are necessary by considering the assignment of customers to vehicles when the information is gradually revealed over horizon time. The procedure to solve this type of problems is referred to as route reoptimization, which is the best option for minimizing expected transportation cost without incurring failures of unsatisfied demand on a route. This paper proposes a heuristic algorithm for the reoptimization of CVRP in which the number of customers increases. The algorithm uses proposed performance metrics to reduce route dispersion and minimize length. The initial solution is generated using the savings algorithm and then enhanced using the Record-to-Record travel metaheuristic. By including or reducing new customers in the system, a reoptimization is performed which considers the visited nodes and edges as fixed. The optimization of the algorithm is implemented hierarchically by first minimizing dispersion and then minimizing distance. Next, the local search procedure is executed to improve the solution. A classic optimization is performed on all instances using the original and new customers’ information for later comparison to minimize distance. The efficiency of the proposed algorithm was validated using real-world cases from the literature. The results are promising and show the effectiveness of the proposed method for solving the considered problem by using reoptimization procedures in order to achieve good approximation ratios within short computing times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it