MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898820713

Chinese chromite imports dip in March

2017· article· en· W2898820713 on OpenAlex
Davide Ghilotti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPigment Synthesis and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromiteChinaQuarter (Canadian coin)Agricultural economicsValue (mathematics)CommerceBusinessRest (music)EconomicsGeographyMetallurgyMathematicsMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

China's demand slowing down in Q1; Buyers unwilling to secure new contracts; Seeking to force market prices down Imports of chromite products into China posted double-digit volume declines in February and March, compounded by the slow buying activity from local importers that has characterised most of 2017 so far. Imports of chromite as a whole, including metallurgical and non-metallurgical chrome materials, showed a steady growth pattern throughout the second half of 2016, according to China Customs data. Following a peak in imports at the beginning of the year, with January deliveries hitting 1.53m tonnes for a total value of $446.67m, the rest of the first quarter saw an evident sequential decline, bearing testimony to the slow trading situation that has affected the market this year to date

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it