MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898834186 · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.24.7.071608

Feasibility of using spatial frequency-domain imaging intraoperatively during tumor resection

2018· article· en· W2898834186 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis J. Wirth, Mira Sibai, Jonathan D. Olson, Brian C. Wilson, David W. Roberts, Keith D. Paulsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Optics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsOpticsMaterials scienceDiffuse optical imagingImage resolutionAbsorption (acoustics)Arc lampSpatial frequencyScatteringLight scatteringBiomedical engineeringPhysicsTomographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mapping the optical absorption and scattering properties of tissues using spatial frequency-domain imaging (SFDI) enhances quantitative fluorescence imaging of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in gliomas in the preclinical setting. The feasibility of using SFDI in the operating room was investigated here. A benchtop SFDI system was modified to mount directly to a commercial operating microscope. A digital light processing module imposed a selectable spatial light pattern from a broad-band xenon arc lamp to illuminate the surgical field. White light excitation and a liquid crystal-tunable filter allowed the diffuse reflectance images to be recorded at discrete wavelengths from 450 to 720 nm on a sCMOS camera. The performance was first tested in tissue-simulating phantoms, and data were then acquired intraoperatively during brain tumor resection surgery. The optical absorption and transport scattering coefficients could be estimated with average errors of 3.2% and 4.5% for the benchtop and clinical systems, respectively, with spatial resolution of better than 0.7 mm. These findings suggest that SFDI can be implemented in a clinically relevant configuration to achieve accurate mapping of the optical properties in the surgical field that can then be applied to achieve quantitative imaging of the fluorophore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical OpticsSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207