Robotics-Assisted Surgical Skills Evaluation based on Electrocortical Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skills assessment in Robotics-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery (RAMIS) is mainly performed based on temporal, motion-based and outcome-based metrics. While these components are essential for the proper assessment of skills in RAMIS, they do not suffice for full representation of all underlying aspects of skilled performance. Besides such commonplace components of skills, there exist other elements to be taken into account for comprehensive skills assessment. Among such elements are cognitive states (such as levels of stress, attention, concentration) that can directly affect performance. Investigating the impact of electrocortical activity and cognitive states of RAMIS surgeons over their performance has, however, received little attention in the literature. Therefore, in this paper, novel performance metrics based on electroencephalography (EEG) signals are studied for potential augmentation into RAMIS training and its assessment platform. For this purpose, a user study was conducted involving 23 novices and 9 expert RAMIS surgeons. The participants were asked to perform two tasks on the dv-Trainer®, (Mimic Technologies) RAMIS simulator, while their brain EEG signals were being measured using the Muse EEG headband (InteraXon Inc.). The performance metrics were defined as mean values of band powers of EEG signals over various ranges of frequency. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate metrics over 5 different ranges of frequency for 4 electrode locations and during 2 RAMIS training tasks. The results indicated statistically significant differences in electrocortical activity between novices and experts in temporoparietal and left frontal regions of their brain for mid to high-frequency ranges. Overall, RAMIS experts showed lower levels of electrocortical activity in those regions compared to novices. The results indicate that electrocortical activity measured by EEG signals have the potential to provide useful information for skills assessment in RAMIS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".