MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898884573 · doi:10.1002/rob.21838

Selective memory: Recalling relevant experience for long‐term visual localization

2018· article· en· W2898884573 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Field Robotics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceLandmarkTerm (time)Artificial intelligenceContext (archaeology)InitializationField (mathematics)Key (lock)Human–computer interactionModalitiesComputer visionReal-time computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Visual navigation is a key enabling technology for autonomous mobile vehicles. The ability to provide large‐scale, long‐term navigation using low‐cost, low‐power vision sensors is appealing for industrial applications. A crucial requirement for long‐term navigation systems is the ability to localize in environments whose appearance is constantly changing over time—due to lighting, weather, seasons, and physical changes. This paper presents a multiexperience localization (MEL) system that uses a powerful map representation—storing every visual experience in layers—that does not make assumptions about underlying appearance modalities and generators. Our localization system provides real‐time performance by selecting online, a subset of experiences against which to localize. We achieve this task through a novel experience‐triage algorithm based on collaborative filtering, which selects experiences relevant to the live view , outperforming competing techniques. Based on classical memory‐based recommender systems, this technique also enables landmark‐level recommendations, is entirely online, and requires no training data. We demonstrate the capabilities of the MEL system in the context of long‐term autonomous path following in unstructured outdoor environments with a challenging 100‐day field experiment through day, night, snow, spring, and summer. We furthermore provide offline analysis comparing our system to several state‐of‐the‐art alternatives. We show that the combination of the novel methods presented in this paper enable full use of incredibly rich multiexperience maps, opening the door to robust long‐term visual localization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it