TRAF2 Cooperates with Focal Adhesion Signaling to Regulate Cancer Cell Susceptibility to Anoikis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract TRAF2, a RING finger adaptor protein, plays an important function in tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- and TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK)-dependent signaling, in particular during inflammatory and immune responses. We identified a functional interaction of TRAF2 with focal adhesion (FA) signaling involving the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in the regulation of cell susceptibility to anoikis. Comparison of TRAF2-proficient (TRAF2+/+) versus TRAF2-deficient (TRAF2−/−), and FAK-proficient (FAK+/+) versus FAK-deficient (FAK−/−) mouse embryonic fibroblasts and their matched reconstituted cells demonstrated that TRAF2 interacts physically with the N-terminal portion of FAK and colocalizes to cell membrane protrusions. This interaction was found to be critical for promoting resistance to cell anoikis. Similar results were confirmed in the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, where TRAF2 and FAK downregulation promoted cell susceptibility to anoikis. In human breast cancer tissues, genomic analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas database revealed coamplification of TRAF2 and FAK in breast cancer tissues with a predictive value for shorter survival, further supporting a potential role of TRAF2–FAK cooperative signaling in cancer progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it