Co-Sparse Analysis Model Based Image Registration to Compensate Brain Shift by Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notwithstanding the widespread use of image guided neurosurgery systems in recent years, the accuracy of these systems is strongly limited by the intra-operative deformation of the brain tissue, the so-called brain shift. Intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) imaging as an effective solution to compensate complex brain shift phenomena update patients coordinate during surgery by registration of the intra-operative ultrasound and the pre-operative MRI data that is a challenging problem.In this work a non-rigid multimodal image registration technique based on co-sparse analysis model is proposed. This model captures the interdependency of two image modalities; MRI as an intensity image and iUS as a depth image. Based on this model, the transformation between the two modalities is minimized by using a bimodal pair of analysis operators which are learned by optimizing a joint co-sparsity function using a conjugate gradient.Experimental validation of our algorithm confirms that our registration approach outperforms several of other state-of-the-art registration methods quantitatively. The evaluation was performed using seven patient dataset with the mean registration error of only 1.83 mm. Our intensity-based co-sparse analysis model has improved the accuracy of non-rigid multimodal medical image registration by 15.37% compared to the curvelet based residual complexity as a powerful registration method, in a computational time compatible with clinical use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".