Investigation Of Interaction Between Physiological Signals And fMRI Dynamic Functional Connectivity Using Independent Component Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) fMRI signal is influenced not only by neuronal activity but also by fluctuations in physiological signals, including respiration, arterial CO2 and heart rate/ heart rate variability (HR/HRV). Even spontaneous physiological signal fluctuations have been shown to influence the BOLD fMRI signal in a regionally specific manner. Consequently, estimates of functional connectivity between different brain regions, performed when the subject is at rest, may be confounded by the effects of physiological signal fluctuations. In addition, resting functional connectivity has been shown to vary with respect to time (dynamic functional connectivity - DFC), with the sources of this variation not fully elucidated. The effect of physiological factors on dynamic (time-varying) resting-state functional connectivity has not been studied extensively, to our knowledge. In our previous study, we investigated the effect of heart rate (HR) and end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) on the time-varying network degree of three well-described RSNs (DMN, SMN and Visual Network) using mask-based and seed-based analysis, and we identified brain-heart interactions which were more pronounced in specific frequency bands. Here, we extend this work, by estimating DFC and its corresponding network degree for the RSNs, employing a data-driven approach to extract the RSNs (low-and high-dimensional Independent Component Analysis (ICA)), which we subsequently correlate with the characteristics of simultaneously collected physiological signals. The results confirm that physiological signals have a modulatory effect on resting-state, fMRI-based DFC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".