Comparison of Microstructure and Properties of In-Situ TiN- and WC-Reinforced NiCrBSi Composite Coatings Prepared by Plasma Spraying
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, NiCrBSi-30 wt.% TiN composite (NTC) coating was produced on carbon steel via plasma spraying, with NiCrBSi-30 wt.% WC composite (NWC) coating as the comparison object. The microstructure and phase constituents of the composite coatings were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) techniques, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and x-ray diffraction (XRD). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to measure electronic work functions. The microhardness and wear performance of coatings were also investigated. The average microhardness of the NTC and NWC coatings was 1000 HV and 850 HV, respectively. In addition, the NTC coating had a wear volume loss of 0.8118 mm³, less than 1.4772 mm³, the volume loss of the NWC coating. This was due to the presence of TiN in the form of nanograins in the composite coating and tighter binding to the matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".