Recycled fiber treated with NaOH/urea aqueous solution: effects on physical properties of paper sheets and on hornification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogen bonding among fiber microfibrils is the primary cause of fiber hornification, wherein NaOH/urea aqueous solution precooled to −13 °C can disassemble inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonds. Whether hornified fibers treated with this process can significantly improve fiber swelling ability and physical properties of the resulting paper sheets remains a problem. In this investigation, the 6th cycle fiber was pretreated with this procedure, and the water retention value of the fiber before and after treatment and the physical properties of the resulting paper sheets were studied. The results indicate that the lignin decline, complete swelling of flat fiber, filling of cellulose film between the interfiber network, and decreasing crystalline region all contribute to the increase in water retention value. The water retention value of repaired fiber is equivalent to that of virgin pulp, and hornification reverses by 89 %. In addition, the cellulose film filling among the fiber network constructs a similar reinforced concrete structure, which causes the tear, burst, and tensile index of the resulting paper sheets to increase by 145 %, 98 %, and 43 %, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".