Effect of Dry Heat Temperature and Moist Heat Pressure on Canola Meal for Ruminant Utilisation. Part I: Nutritional, Protein Solubility and Degradability Characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of a range of barrel dry heat temperatures (20 to 180 oC), and moist heat pressure (MHP) (120 oC 15 min 192 kPa) on general nutritional, protein solubility, and in vitro protein degradability characteristics of canola meal were investigated. Increasing dry heat temperature was negatively correlated with meal crude protein (CP), soluble CP, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent insoluble CP, and rapidly degradable (B1 Fraction) protein; and positively with NPN, intermediately degradable (B2 Fraction) protein, dry matter, lipid, carbohydrate, and in vitro rumen-undegradable protein. Relative to control meal, MHP increased in vitro rumen-undegradable protein, and in vitro CP digestibility; and decreased soluble protein, and 0.5% KOH solubility. Positive increases of Fraction A and B2, as B1 decreased, suggest barrel temperature induces protein hydrolysis and conversion of rapidly to intermediately degraded protein, respectively. The changes observed may have a great effect on ruminal degradation and supply of protein and AA for ruminant utilisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".