MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Overlap Syndrome)

2018· article· en· W2899006180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCOPDHypoxemiaObstructive sleep apneaHeart failureContinuous positive airway pressureCardiologyMyocardial infarctionSleep apneaInternal medicinePositive airway pressureHypopneaProportional hazards modelApnea–hypopnea indexPolysomnographyApnea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale The combined impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cardiovascular outcomes remains controversial. Objectives We determined whether the combined presence of COPD and severe OSA defined by the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) or degree of nocturnal hypoxemia is associated with increased hazards of cardiovascular events and mortality. Methods Prospectively collected data from adults with suspected OSA who underwent sleep study between 1994 and 2010 were linked to provincial administrative data to determine a presence of COPD and composite outcome. Exposures of interest were: 1) AHI greater than 30, and 2) 10 or more minutes of sleep time spent with oxygen saturation (SaO2) less than 90%. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization due to myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, cardiac revascularization procedures, or death from any cause. Using Cox regression and controlling for confounders, hazards were compared between four groups: AHI greater than 30 with COPD, AHI greater than 30 without COPD, AHI less than or equal to 30 with COPD, and AHI less than or equal to 30 without COPD (reference). A similar approach was used for the degree of nocturnal hypoxemia. Relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) was calculated. To adjust for the effect of positive airway pressure treatment, given that information on its acceptance, but not adherence, was available, a separate analysis was conducted only on untreated individuals who never claimed a positive airway pressure device. Results Among 10,149 participants, 30% had AHI greater than 30, 25% spent at least 10 minutes of sleep with SaO2 less than 90%, and 12% had COPD. Over a median of 9.4 years, 16.4% developed an outcome. In the total sample, a greater hazard of outcome was observed in individuals with COPD who spent at least 10 minutes of sleep with SaO2 less than 90% (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60 to 2.28) but not with AHI greater than 30; a synergistic effect was found in women (RERI, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.05 to 2.30), but not men (RERI, −0.08; 95% CI, −0.47 to 0.32). The highest hazard of outcome was associated with the co-occurrence of AHI greater than 30 and COPD in untreated individuals (hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.55 to 2.62); a synergistic effect was not found. Conclusions In adults with suspected OSA, the co-occurrence of nocturnal hypoxemia and COPD was associated with an increased hazard of cardiovascular events and mortality with a synergistic effect found only in women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it