MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899006753 · doi:10.1109/ccta.2018.8511338

Self-Tuning Active Tuned Mass Damper Utilizing Constrained Multi-Variable Sliding Mode Extremum-Seeking

2018· article· en· W2899006753 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Hossein Kamali, Mehrdad Moallem, Siamak Arzanpour

Bibliographic record

Venue2018 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Tuned mass damperStiffnessActuatorDamperDisplacement (psychology)Power (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an electromechanical actuator is utilized for bidirectional power flow in a tuned mass damper (TMD). The actuator force is controlled to achieve desired mechanical damping and stiffness values for the whole system by controlling the current using a power electronic converter. The resulting TMD can autonomously change its damping and stiffness values to minimize a host structure's displacement under different excitation frequencies. A multi-variable sliding mode extremum-seeking algorithm is used to tune the TMD damping and stiffness levels to optimal values. Analytic and simulation results show that the active TMD exhibits better performance when compared to non-adaptive and robust TMDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2018 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA)Same topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207