Facile fabrication of an electrolyte-gated In <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> nanoparticle-based thin-film transistor uniting laser ablation and inkjet printing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We propose the inkjet printing of new thin-film transistors (TFTs) based upon a sodium alginate (NaAlg) electrolyte–gate and a new In 2 O 3 nanoparticle ink in which the electrodes and channels were formed by laser ablation. Laser ablation improved the conductive ink channel resolution leading to a smaller channel length through low-temperature processing steps. The NaAlg based electrolyte and a thickness independent gate dielectric allow for an in-plane design resulting in relaxed manufacturing tolerance requirements and reduced processing steps/time. The fabricated TFT operates at a very low voltage (<1.5 V) with a measured field-effect mobility of 0.77 cm 2 V −1 s −1 and an ON/OFF current ratio exceeding 10 5 . The electrolyte-gated TFTs exhibit excellent durability over 1500 switching cycles and 10 days. The TFTs demonstrate no cytotoxicity in vitro , indicating that they have the potential to be suitable for low-cost environmentally friendly electronics and biosensor applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".