East Otago Taiāpure: sharing the underlying philosophies 26 years on
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Taiāpure (local fishery) are Customary fisheries Protection Areas (CPAs) designed to make better provision for rangatiratanga (Māori chieftainship) under Article II of te Tiriti o Waitangi. The East Otago Taiāpure was applied for in 1992 and finally gazetted in 1999. It has been twenty‐six years since the East Otago Taiāpure was applied for and the East Otago Taiāpure Management Committee has incorporated mātauranga‐ā‐hapū (sub‐tribal knowledge) as well as local knowledge to inform decision making to advocate for better management of local fisheries and ecosystems for the benefit of all people and the generations to come. We provide a narrative from over a quarter of a century of management of the East Otago Taiāpure to provide a useful reference for communities wishing to explore the taiāpure concept to realise rangatiratanga for their uri (descendants) to come.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".