MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2899049856 · doi:10.7939/r3qj78611

Geochemistry, Geochronology, and Fluid Inclusion Study of the Newton Epithermal Gold, and Morrison Porphyry Copper Deposits, British Columbia

2015· article· en· W2899049856 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liu LiJuan

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeochronologyGeologyPorphyry copper depositGeochemistryCopperInclusion (mineral)Fluid inclusionsOre genesisMineralogyPaleontologyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Petrologic, geochemical, geochronological, and fluid inclusion studies were conducted on the Newton epithermal and Morrison porphyry deposits in central British Columbia, as a part of a large collaborative research project to combine geological, ZTEM, magnetotelluric, and magnetic studies, in order to improve the effectiveness of ZTEM surveys for deep mineral exploration. Newton is an intermediate-sulfidation epithermal gold deposit, which is spatially and genetically related to a Late Cretaceous volcanoplutonic complex. The mineralized felsic volcanic rocks, feldspar-quartz-hornblende porphyry, and quartz-feldspar porphyry from the volcanoplutonic complex yielded U-Pb zircon ages of 72.1 ± 0.6 Ma (Amarc Resources Ltd., unpublished data, reported in McClenaghan, 2013), 72.1 ± 0.48 Ma (new data), and 70.9 ± 0.5 Ma (Amarc Resources Ltd., unpublished data, reported in McClenaghan, 2013), respectively. A barren diorite intrusion yielded a slightly younger U-Pb age of 69.32 ± 0.43 Ma. Gold occurs as electrum and gold-silver telluride, which are present as inclusions in disseminated pyrite and marcasite. Three stages of mineralization are recognized: (1) disseminated pyrite with gold inclusions, and rare quartz-pyrite ± molybdenite veins; (2) disseminated marcasite with gold inclusions; (3) polymetallic pyrite-chalcopyrite-sphalerite-arsenopyrite veins. Molybdenite from a porphyry-hosted stage 1 quartz-calcite-pyrite-molybdenite vein yielded a Re-Os data of 72.1 ± 0.3 Ma (McClenaghan, 2013), which is taken to represent the age of mineralization. A relatively hot and saline hydrothermal fluid was related to stage 1 mineralization, and homogenization temperatures and salinities of fluid inclusions in a stage 1 quartz–pyrite ± molybdenite ± gold vein average 313 ± 51°C (n = 82) and 4.8 ± 0.9 wt.% NaCl equiv. (n = 46), respectively. The predominance of disseminated mineralization suggests that wallrock reaction and cooling were the main controls on gold precipitation, although evidence for boiling was also observed in the veins. Morrison is a typical porphyry Cu-Au-Mo deposit, spatially and genetically related to Eocene plagioclase-hornblende-biotite porphyry intrusions. The porphyry intrusions are part of a calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline diorite to granodiorite intrusive suite with continental arc affinity, and yielded a U-Pb age of 52.21 ± 0.37 Ma. The mineralization can be divided into 3 stages: (1) disseminated and vein-type chalcopyrite-bornite; (2) quartz-molybdenite-pyrite veins; and (3) polymetallic dolomite ± quartz-sphalerite-galena-arsenopyrite-chalcopyrite veins. Molybdenite yielded ages of 52.54 ± 0.22 and 53.06 ± 0.22 Ma, which are broadly consistent with the age of the porphyry intrusions, indicating a genetic relationship. Fluid inclusion (Th = 400 to 526°C; salinity = 39.8 to 47.8 wt.% NaCl equiv.), sulfur isotope (δ34S = -0.2 and 0.8‰ for pyrite and chalcopyrite intergrowths), and oxygen isotope (δ18Ofluid = 3.7 to 6.3‰) data for stage 1 mineralization indicate that the early Cu-Au-bearing fluids were likely of magmatic origin. A cooler and slightly less saline fluid (Th = 320 to 421°C; salinity = 37.0 to 43.1 wt.% NaCl equiv.) was responsible for stage 2 mineralization. Sulfur isotope (δ34S = -2.1 and -1.2‰ for molybdenite and pyrite, respectively) and oxygen isotope (δ18Ofluid = 0.3 to 3.4‰) data from stage 2 minerals suggest a contribution from meteoric groundwater and sediment-derived S to fluids still dominantly of magmatic origin. Stage 3 was associated with cooler and much more dilute fluids (Th = 163° to 218°C; salinity = 3.1 to 3.9 wt.% NaCl equiv.), with oxygen isotopic compositions of δ18Ofluid ≈ -2 to +4‰ from early vein quartz, and 0.8 to 6.3‰ from late vein dolomite, sulfur isotopic compositions for sphalerite and pyrite of δ34S = -7.1 and -5.6‰ (respectively), and carbon isotopic compositions from dolomite of δ13C = 0.6 and 0.7‰. These characteristics suggest that stage 3 fluids were likely dominantly of meteoric water origin (with some wallrock isotopic exchange), and derived C and S from the sedimentary country rocks. The results of this study will be used to constrain geological and petrophysical models that are being developed to improve the effectiveness of ZTEM surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta Library→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→