MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899061734 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2018.2873809

A Hilbert Transform Equalizer Enabling 80 MHz RF Self-Interference Cancellation for Full-Duplex Receivers

2018· article· en· W2899061734 on OpenAlexafffund
A. El Sayed, Amit Kumar Mishra, Abdelrahman H. Ahmed, Amir Hossein Masnadi Shirazi, Sang-Pil Woo, Yang-Seok Choi, Shahriar Mirabbasi, Sudip Shekhar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC MicrosystemsIntel Corporation
KeywordsBasebandBandwidth (computing)Single antenna interference cancellationCMOSElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceAdaptive equalizerEqualization (audio)TelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A passive, time-domain equalizer is presented that achieves a broadband self-interference cancellation (SIC) over 80 MHz of RF bandwidth for simultaneous full-duplex radios. A baseband Hilbert transform technique reduces the number of equalizer taps needed for SIC, and with frequency translations, results in an equivalent RF-domain equalization. A proof-of-concept prototype in 0.13-$\mu \text{m}$CMOS process attains a measured 23 dB of SIC over an 80 MHz signal bandwidth at 900 MHz, and consumes 13 mW of clocking power independent of SIC equalizer settings. Its impact on the receiver noise figure is 1.4 dB. The equalizer and the receiver together consume 64.4 mW from a 1.2 V supply in an active area of 0.72 mm2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207