MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899066542 · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-13223

A Hermeneutical Solution to the Problem of Philosophic Education

2018· dissertation· en· W2899066542 on OpenAlexaff
Marc A. Ashford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipInterpretation (philosophy)EpistemologyHermeneuticsPhilosophyThe RepublicLawPolitical scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Thesis examines the problem of philosophic education.It outlines a problem of philosophic education that comes out of ancient and modern scholarship concerning the initiation into philosophy.Essentially every philosopher and scholar who has looked at it is unable to describe the conditions of what a philosophic education is.The problem gets originally illuminated out of the Laws and Republic of Plato.The final chapter of the thesis looks at the dialogue Gorgias and adopts a hermeneutical interpretation of the text to see what the conditions might be for a philosophic education to be possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.068
Scholarly communication0.0090.015
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0060.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207