Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 210 is one of very few deep-sea legs drilled along the eastern Canadian continental margin. Most other drilling on this margin has been carried out by the petroleum industry on the shallow-water regions of the Scotian shelf and the Grand Banks (see Doeven, 1983, for nannofossil studies). Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) Leg 12 Site 111 and ODP Leg 105 Site 647 were drilled in the general vicinity of Leg 210 but recovered no appreciable Lower Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian) sediments. Site 111 yielded indurated limestones dated tentatively as late Albian-early Cenomanian, whereas Site 647 encountered no Albian-Cenomanian sediments.Two sites (Sites 1276 and 1277) were drilled during Leg 210 in the Newfoundland Basin with the primary objective of recovering basement rocks to elucidate the rifting history of the North Atlantic Basin. The location for Leg 210 was selected because it is conjugate to the Iberia margin, which was drilled extensively during DSDP/ODP Legs 47B, 103, 149, and 173. A secondary but equally important objective was to recover the overlying sediments with the purpose of studying the postrift sedimentation history of this margin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".