ARTEFAK DALAM KONTEKS PERKEMBANGAN KAWASAN HERITAGE ISLAM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACTIslam is the majority religion in Indonesia, but unfortunately none of the historic sites of Islam in Indonesia became a common concern in the international world. The heritage of Islamic culture is a unique heritage because there is a process of acculturation and change of civilization in a fairly fast time (50 years) from the Hindu-Buddhist kingdom to the Islamic kingdom. Islamic cultural heritage so far only focusing in the existence of mosques and tombs and not focusing in spatial management. This indicates that there is a gap of knowledge on the disciplines of archeology and spatial planning, especially in the management of cultural heritage that should be a multi-disciplinary domain.The methods used in this study is qualitative studywith focus on building a spatial and archeology approaches to the heritage management. With the aim of space categorization and also the types of artifacts available, this paper finds that artifacts are divided into two namely those found or located in the core area and those in the supporting area.Keyword: Islamic Heritage, Artifacts ABSTRAKIslam merupakan agama mayoritas di Indonesia, namun sayangnya tidak satupun situs bersejarah islam menjadi concern bersama dalam dunia Internasional. Warisan kebudayaan islam merupakan sebuah warisan yang unik karena terjadi proses akulturasi dan perubahan peradaban dala waktu yang cukup cepat (50 tahun) dari kerajaan Hindu-Budha menjadi kerajaan Islam Kawasan cagar budaya dalam pengelolaan cagar budaya kawasan islam selama ini hanya teridentifikasi pada keberadaan masjid dan makam. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa adanya kesenjangan pengetahuan terhadap disiplin ilmu arkeologi dan perencanaan ruang, terutama dalam pengelolaan cagar budaya yang seharusnya menjadi ranah multi disiplin ilmu. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan menggunakan pengamatan tersetruktur dan konten analisis yang difokuskan pada data-data sekunder (literature review) yang menggabungkan antara ilmu arkeologi dan keruangan (spasial). Dengan tujuan dari kategorisasi ruang dan juga jenis artefak yang ada, makalah ini menemukan bahwa artefak terbagi atas dua yakni yang ditemukan atau berada di Kawasan inti dan yang berada di kawasan pendukung.Kata Kunci:Warisan Kebudayaan Islam, Artefak
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it